Skip to content
Decide

Compare your options before you commit budget

Fractional leadership is not always the right answer. These pages set out what each option is actually accountable for, what it costs, and the situations where the alternative wins.

Comparisons

Three decisions most businesses face

Each page ends with a plain recommendation, including when not to hire me.

  • Fractional CMO vs marketing agency

    Hire an agency when you know what to do and need capacity to do it well. Hire a Fractional CMO when nobody senior owns the strategy, the budget or the numbers. If you cannot state your target cost per qualified enquiry, leadership comes first — otherwise the agency is optimising towards a goal nobody set.

    Read the comparison
  • Fractional CMO vs full-time Marketing Director

    Below roughly £5m turnover, or where the marketing function is not yet defined, fractional leadership is normally the better first move: senior thinking within weeks, at one or two days a month, with no recruitment risk. A full-time Marketing Director becomes the right hire once there is a team and a proven plan to run.

    Read the comparison
  • Fractional CMO vs freelance marketer

    A freelance marketer delivers defined work — content, ads, email, a website — against your brief. A Fractional CMO sets the brief, owns the strategy and budget, manages suppliers and reports to the board on pipeline. One is capacity; the other is leadership and accountability.

    Read the comparison
Questions

Choosing between the options

What is the difference between a fractional CMO and a marketing agency?
A fractional CMO owns the strategy, the priorities and the commercial outcome, and is accountable for deciding what not to do. An agency executes a defined channel brief well but is not accountable for whether that channel was the right choice. Many businesses end up needing both — leadership to set direction, delivery to run it.
When is hiring a full-time Marketing Director the better choice?
When there is enough sustained internal work to fill a full-time role, a team already reporting into it, and budget for a salary plus employment costs year-round. If the need is direction rather than daily management, a fractional arrangement gives you the same seniority for a fraction of the cost.
Is a freelance marketer cheaper than fractional leadership?
Per day, often yes. The difference is scope: a freelancer usually delivers a defined task, while fractional leadership sets the strategy, chooses the channels and holds the plan together. Paying a lower day rate for the wrong plan is the more expensive outcome.
How do I decide which option fits my business?
Start with the constraint. If you do not know which channels should get next quarter's budget, you have a leadership gap. If you know exactly what to do but have nobody to do it, you have a delivery gap. Each comparison page ends with a plain recommendation, including when not to hire me.
Still not sure?

Bring the question to a discovery call

One hour, no pitch. If an agency, a freelancer or a permanent hire is the better answer for you, I will say so.