This site should work for everyone
If any part of it does not work for you, that is a defect and I want to know about it. Below is the standard this site aims at, how it is built, and where the gaps are.
What has been done
Accessibility is checked as part of the same automated gate that checks performance and SEO before anything ships.
Standard we aim at
This site is built to meet WCAG 2.2 level AA. That covers colour contrast, keyboard operation, focus visibility, text resizing to 200% without loss of content, and content that works with screen readers.
How it is built
Pages use semantic HTML with one H1 and a logical heading order, landmark regions, labelled form fields with inline error messages, descriptive link text, and alt text on every meaningful image. Decorative graphics are hidden from assistive technology.
Keyboard and motion
Every interactive element — navigation, accordions, forms, the assistant and dialogs — can be reached and operated by keyboard, with a visible focus style and focus kept inside open dialogs. Animation respects the operating system's reduce-motion setting.
Known limitations
Embedded third-party content, including social video and scheduling tools, is not fully under my control and may not meet the same standard. If any embedded content blocks you, tell me and I will supply the same information another way.
Reporting a problem
Include the page address and what happened. I aim to respond within two working days.
- Phone
- +44 (0)7903 966074
- Alternative formats
- Any guide, proposal or report published here can be supplied as plain text, large print or an accessible document on request.
Accessibility questions
Which accessibility standard does this site aim at?
How do I report an accessibility problem?
How quickly will a reported barrier be answered?
Can content be supplied in another format?
What are the known accessibility limitations?
Call or email directly
If a form on this site is the barrier, do not use it. Phone or email me and we will sort it that way.